github - If you git rebase and push, vs if you git pull, merge, and push, does it help the project maintainer the work of merging? -


it said if don't git rebase, project maintainer person may ask rebase changes (say, bugfix1122-branch) tip of master or development branch.

but save project maintainer's time merging it? thought either git pull, merge, , push, merge it, project maintainer doesn't have to. true? rebasing flatten history, flattening tree linear structure, git history more linear?

yes, rebasing branch onto master , merging master in before opening pull request have same effect, far helping project maintainer merge goes.

you right in saying rebasing done flatten history. however, there's special case in believe outperforms merge: when have conflicts. rebase force fix conflicts as commits applied, conflict resolution won't seen maintainer of project. merge, on other hand, force resolve conflicts all @ once, creating merge commit result, can make things harder understand maintainer.

that being said, becomes less of problem if github being used, allows maintainer review changes rather reviewing commits. personally, review commits, that's why prefer rebase. in end, comes down maintainer prefers, instructions in contributing.md file (if available) before opening pull request.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

javascript - jQuery: Add class depending on URL in the best way -

i have html progress meter: <div class="col-md-3" style="margin-left: -20px;"> <div class="progress-pos active" id="progess-1"> <div class="progress-pos-inner"> login </div> </div> </div> <div class="col-md-3 progress-pos-container"> <div class="progress-pos" id="progess-2"> <div class="progress-pos-inner"> scan items </div> </div> </div> <div class="col-md-3 progress-pos-container"> <div class="progress-pos" id="progess-3"> <div class="progress-pos-inner"> confirm address </div> </div> </div> <div class="col-md-3 progress-pos-container"> <div class="progress-pos" id="progess-4"> <div class="progress-pos-in
Read more

caching - How to check if a url path exists in the service worker cache -

i need check if particular url path exists in service worker cache. example, suppose url is: /myserviceworker/service?a=110&b=70 this url exists in cache, there many of them different values of , b. now, suppose want refresh of these urls, how can that? i want know how access key values service worker cache. if know key, plan follows: var url = new url(key); if(url.pathname === "\/myserviceworker/service") refetch key but not sure how cache key , in format is. mean, string or url? cache api has match() method returns promise resolving in response object if match or undefined if no match exists. second parameter object can specify ignoresearch not take account url parameters. the ignoresearch option supported firefox ( chrome status here ). in other hand, retrieve cache entries, can use keys() method.
Read more

Redirect to a HTTPS version using .htaccess -

i need modify .htaccess file redirect urls https version without "www". http://example.com --> https://example.com http://www.example.com --> https://example.com https://www.example.com --> https://example.com this how .htaccess file looks like: rewriteengine on rewritecond %{request_filename} !-d rewritecond %{request_filename} !-f rewriterule ^(.*)$ redirect.php?id=$1&page=$2 [qsa,l] what modifications need make .htaccess in order forward https without "www"? it depends on doing current code. looks file called redirect trying display php page seo friendly url. think might confusing people. anyway, need , force https without www, need 1 more rule above. also second rule needs two capture groups in rewriterule test string because wanting 2 different values using $1 , $2 references. rewriteengine on #rediect www non www and/or http https --- combinations. rewritecond %{http_host} !^example\.com [nc,or] rewritecond %{https} !^
Read more